EXHIBIT 7A Judge Koh deliberately fails to apply the LAW and the FACTS by refusing to acknowledge the Harper v. City of Los Angeles 533 F.3d 1010 (9th Cir. 2008) case when making ruling on Summary Judgement.
|
|
EXHIBIT 7B Judge Koh ruled citizens are not allowed to cross-examine experts contrary to the established LAW by the U.S. Supreme Court in the MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. MASSACHUSETTS and Koh ruled that law enforcement officers can use falsified evidence including audio/video recordings to incriminate citizens of crimes so long as the citizens do not have the financial resources to purchase expert testimony
Judge Koh told the Senate Judiciary Committee what they wanted to hear so that she would be appointed to the bench. Upon taking her seat, Judge Koh immediately began issuing rulings in complete contradiction to what she informed the U.S. Senate how she would.
|
|
EXHIBIT 7C Still trying to worm her way out of her bogus ruling, Judge Koh falsely applies Federal Rules of Civil Procedure upon her decision to the SECOND Motion for Reconsideration. Judge Koh did not state anything in her ruling on Summary Judgement or the FIRST Motion for Reconsideration about citing case law in a complaint as justification to deny a claim. If Judge Koh's legal rational were true, the whole case should have been thrown out immediately, for the Complaint does not have any case law.
|
EVEN SO: Ciampi did cite Brady v. Maryland in his Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgement.
Another Lie to the U.S. Senate
U.S. SUPREME COURT----- MELENDEZ-DIAZ V. MASSACHUSETTS