Eric Holder knowingly and deliberately colluded with the Palo Alto Police to violate the Constitution of the United States by condoning the use of falsified evidence by law enforcement to incriminate a citizen of a crime. |
|
Obama was informed as early as February 2009 of the crimes of the Palo Alto Police. EXHIBIT 3
AG Eric Holder was provided all of the evidence on January 13, 2010 after the FBI was provided the evidence in October of 2008 and January of 2009. EXHIBIT 4
AG Eric Holder was provided all of the evidence on January 13, 2010 after the FBI was provided the evidence in October of 2008 and January of 2009. EXHIBIT 4
President Barack Obama, appointed Lucy Koh to a Federal Judgeship so that she could rule that police officers can use fabricated and falsified videos to incriminate citizens of crimes in order to conceal the crimes of the Palo Alto Police.
Judge Koh Conspiracy
Judge Koh Conspiracy
New AG Loretta Lynch has followed Holder's lead and is covering up the crimes of the Palo Alto Police
In 2008 Palo Alto Police under the supervision of former Police Chief Lynne Johnson and current Police Chief Dennis Burns admitted to destroying evidence in violation of Calif. Penal Codes 135, 141(b) and 1054. CLICK HERE to see how the Palo Alto Police and the Santa Clara County District Attorney tried to imprison a U.S. Citizen, Tony Ciampi, by knowingly using fabricated audio/video recordings and Taser guns. Andrew Hinz of Taser International admits to destroying the two taser cameras that recorded the incident. After providing an expert report that concluded that the taser videos had been falsified, (FORENSIC EXPERT ANALYSIS) the Santa Clara County DA and Eric Holder of the DOJ circled the wagons to protect Chief Burns and his subordinate officers from being held accountable even after the Santa Clara County Crime Lab verified the videos had been tampered with.
|
|
JUDGE KOH'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST
|
In 2009 through 2010 Judge Lucy Koh’s husband, Mariano-Florintino Cuellar, (Tino), was working in the White House for President Obama, when Obama appointed Judge Koh to the federal bench in January 2010. (EXHIBIT 2A)
Obama, Cuellar, Koh and Espinosa went to Harvard. |
1) Ciampi filed his federal lawsuit against the Palo Alto Police in June of 2009. Ciampi’s case was assigned to Judge Jeremy Fogel who presided over it for a year. Judge Koh was confirmed by the Senate and took her seat on the bench replacing udge Ronald M. Whyte who assumed senior status.
Within days of taking her position on the federal bench Ciampi’s case was reassigned to Judge Koh contrary to standard procedure and actually contrary to Cannon 3 A (2) of the Guide to Judiciary Policy, Ethics and Judicial Conduct which states a Judge is to remain on the case to the end.
2) Judge Koh’s boss, Judge James Ware used to work with current long time Palo Alto City Councilman and former Mayor Larry Klein revealing the conflict of interest due to Ware's close relationship with Palo Alto Councilman Larry Klein.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW ENLARGED ARTICLE: |
6) AG Eric Holder was informed of the Constitutional violations of the Palo Alto Police but he and his department refused to honestly and thoroughly investigate the matter. (EXHIBIT 4A)
It is presumed as a favor to Michael Gennaco. Given Taser International's acts of aiding and abetting the cover-up, it appears that the DOJ is also protecting Taser International and the false perception of taser guns and their use. 7) Based upon the numerous conflicts of interest and the fact that Judge Koh not once but twice refused to remove herself from Ciampi’s civil case in violation of CANON 3A(2) AND CANON 3C(1) Guide to Judiciary Policy, Ethics and Judicial Conduct leads one to believe that Koh was given a Federal Judgeship with the sole purpose of squashing Ciampi’s case against the Palo Alto police in order to conceal the Palo Alto Police and Gennaco’s crimes.
CANON 3C(1) states: "A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned,..." Even after being informed of her violation, Judge Koh knowingly and deliberately refused to secure exhibits that were part of a Motion for Summary Judgement ,evidence, that was submitted by the Defendants in Ciampi's case with the Court Clerk in violation of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 5(d)(2)(B). CLICK HERE. One would have to think that a Judge deliberately suppressing evidence in her chambers by violating Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on behalf of one party and to the harm of the opposing party in a case would call into question the lack of impartiality of the Judge. For More Go Here: Judicial Code Violations |
3) In addition to her husband being a Stanford professor Judge Koh had developed strong ties to the Palo Alto area by working for two local and prestigious law firms. (EXHIBIT 2E)
4) To further complicate the matter the Palo Alto Independent Police Auditor, Michael Gennaco,
and Judge Koh both worked at high levels in the U.S. Department of Justice and both worked out of the same DOJ office in Los Angeles at the same time.
Michael Gennaco was the first person that Ciampi informed that Palo Alto Police Officer Manuel Temores’ MAV video had been tampered and falsified on May 13, 2008 two weeks after Ciampi first viewed the video. Mr. Gennaco conspired with the Palo Alto police to cover up their crimes. Gennaco works closely with Palo Alto Police Chief Dennis Burns. As a part of his bogus investigation, Gennaco refused to acknowledge that Burns violated department policy by suppressing evidence. See how Gennaco did it here: http://gennacobarcomplaint.weebly.com/ 5) Current Palo Alto City Councilman Sid Espinosa also attended Harvard University and worked for the DOJ along with Koh and PA IPA Gennaco. See (EXHIBIT 2D)
|
CLICK HERE to read MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE KOH and other Court Filings that detail how Judge Koh ruled against the Facts and the Law in Case No.: 09-CV-02655-LHK U.S. District Court Northern District of California in order to conceal the crimes of the Palo Alto Police. (EXHIBIT 1A)
|
|
|
Copyright © 2018 by Joseph Anthony Ciampi
All rights reserved. Except as permitted under the U.S Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, or stored in a data base or retrieval system without prior written permission of the publisher, Joseph Anthony Ciampi, P.O. Box 1681 Palo Alto, CA 94302.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved. September 24, 2012
No portion of this website, writing or speech may be reproduced in any manner on any website, periodical, newspaper, media outlet, book pamphlet or any other form of publication whether for profit or not without the express written consent of the author, Joseph Anthony Ciampi.